Referees (or reviewers) play a fundamental role in the editorial process of BOSQUE. By providing critical and constructive evaluations of submitted manuscripts, they contribute directly to the advancement of scientific knowledge and ensure the quality and integrity of the articles published in the journal. The review process is carried out altruistically and anonymously with respect to the authors.
Manuscripts are sent to at least two referees who are experts in the subject area. This allows the Editorial Committee to consider a diversity of specialist opinions before making a final publication decision.
Referees are expected to provide rigorous and timely evaluations, typically within three weeks of receiving the manuscript. If a referee is unable to meet this deadline, they should promptly decline the review invitation. If additional time is needed, an extension may be requested from the Editor.
Referees should decline to review any manuscript in which they detect a potential conflict of interest or if they feel they cannot provide an impartial and objective evaluation.
A thorough review should include a balanced analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, constructive suggestions for improvement, and specific questions or comments for the authors. These comments should guide authors in revising the manuscript and ultimately improving its scientific contribution and clarity for future readers.
Confidentiality must be strictly maintained. Referees must not share, use, or disseminate any data, results, or other content from the manuscript under review. Any such action is considered unethical.
Referees must refrain from requesting the inclusion of citations to their own work unless clearly relevant and justified within the scope of the manuscript. They should also avoid suggesting the addition of content unrelated to the objectives of the study.
If a manuscript is recommended for rejection or major revision, the Editorial Committee may later request the referee to evaluate the revised version. The peer review process is designed not only to assess manuscript quality but also to contribute to its improvement.
To promote transparency and consistency, the Editor and Associate Editors may share anonymized review reports among referees working on the same manuscript. This practice helps harmonize evaluations, resolve discrepancies, and improve the editorial process.
Referees will be informed of the final editorial decision regarding the manuscripts they have reviewed. In recognition of their valuable contribution, the Editor will issue an acknowledgment email after each completed review. Additionally, the names and affiliations of referees will be published in the first issue of the journal in the following year.
